peer reviewed publications/

Open Access articles are marked for easy download.

In keeping with CC BY-NC-ND license, all publications are available for download by clicking on [link] at the end of each publication [some may ask you to request access from the repository].

If you require the final published article, please contact me and I may be able to share available author’s copies.

journal articles //

  1. Nandagiri, R., Coast, E., Strong, J., Footman, K., Pizzarossa, L. B., Wenham, C., & Jelinska, K. (2025). Precarity and Pills in a Pandemic: online abortion care-seeking in Poland during COVID-19. SSM-Qualitative Research in Health, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100663 [Open Access]

  2. Senderowicz, L., & Nandagiri, R. (2025). Thirty years of ‘strange bedmates’: The ICPD and the nexus of population control, feminism, and family planning. Population Studies, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2024.2441824 [Open Access]

  3. Coast, E., Nandagiri, R., Fry, A., de Almada, M., Johnston, H., Atay, H., ... & Pizzarossa, L. B. (2024). Abortion and well-being: a narrative literature review. SSM-Qualitative research in health, 100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100508 [Open Access]

  4. Nandagiri, R., & Pizzarossa, L. B. (2023). Transgressing biomedical and legal boundaries: The “enticing and hazardous” challenges and promises of a Self-Managed Abortion multiverse. Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 100, p. 102799). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102799 [Open Access]

  5. Freeman, C., & Nandagiri, R. (2023). No 'bad' abortions: Graphic narratives as abortion discourse. MAI: Feminism and Visual Culture, (10). https://maifeminism.com/no-bad-abortions-graphic-narratives-as-feminist-discourse/ [Open Access]

  6. Nandagiri, R. (2021). What’s so troubling about ‘voluntary’ family planning anyway? A feminist perspective. Population Studies, 75(1), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.1996623 [Open Access]

  7. Nandagiri, R., & Pizzarossa, L. B. (2021). Self-managed abortion: a constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws? Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1899764 [Open Access]

  8. Nandagiri, R., Coast, E., & Strong, J. (2020). COVID-19 and Abortion: Making Structural Violence Visible. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1320 [Open Access]

  9. Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., and Nandagiri, R. (2020). Digital by default: children’s capacity to understand and manage online data and privacy. Media and Communication. 8(4), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3407 [Open Access]

  10. Nandagiri, R. (2019). “Like a mother-daughter relationship”: Community health intermediaries’ knowledge of and attitudes to abortion in Karnataka, India. Social Science and Medicine. 239, 112525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112525 [link]

  11. Stoilova, M., Nandagiri, R., & Livingstone, S. (2019). Children’s understanding of personal data and privacy online – a systematic evidence mapping, Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657164  [link]

  12. Nandagiri, R. (2012). The politics of being “young”: Is a “youth” category really necessary for “development”? Feminist Africa. 17, 114-121. [link]

book chapters //

  1. Berro Pizzarossa, L, and Nandagiri,R (2026) A Proportional Response? Abortion Exceptionalism, Telemedicine, and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Great Britain, In: Biller-Andorno, N, März, JW, Mouton-Dorey, C, and Dagron, S. (eds), Proportionality: A Guiding Principle in Public Health Law, Ethics, and Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197759370.003.0020 [Open Access]

  2. Strong, J., Coast, E., Nandagiri, R. (2023). Abortion, Stigma, and Intersectionality. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_103-1 [link]

  3. Strong, J., Nandagiri, R., Randall, S., & Coast, E. (2023). Qualitative research in demography: marginal and marginalised. In How to Conduct Qualitative Research in Social Science (pp. 147). http://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376199.00015 [link]

  4. Nandagiri, R. (2022). ‘I Feel Like Some Kind of Namoona’: Examining Sterilisation in Women's Abortion Trajectories in India. In: Boydell, V. and Dow, K. (eds.) Technologies of Reproduction Across the Lifecourse (Emerald Studies in Reproduction, Culture and Society), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-733-620221005 [link]

  5. Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Data and privacy literacy: The role of the school in educating children in a datafied society. The Handbook of Media Education Research, 413-425. [link]

  6. Nandagiri, R. (2017). Post-what? Global advocacy and its disconnects: the Cairo legacy and the post-2015 agenda. In: Harcourt, W, (ed.) Bodies in Resistance: Gender and Sexual Politics in the Age of Neoliberalism. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, UK, pp. 235-249. ISBN 9781137477798 [link]

reports //

  1. Nandagiri, R. (2023). 8 Billion Lives, Infinite Possibilities: The case for rights and choices. UNFPA, New York. https://www.unfpa.org/swp2023 [contributor, chapter two]

  2. Singh, S., Juarez, F., Machiyama, K., & Nandagiri, R. (2023). Methodologies for Measuring Pregnancy Intention and Unintended Pregnancy and Birth: Summary Report on an IUSSP Scientific Workshop. https://kris.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/201717639/Summary_Report_of_2021_IUSSP_Workshop_on_Measurement_of_Pregnancy_Intention.pdf.